现如今有不少人都是第一次进行文献总述撰写，那么关于初学者来说，要怎样写文献总述，该怎么完成好该部分内容。其实文献总述的质量必定 ...文献综述是每个我国留学生都会经历的一种论文方式，其写作难度不亚于一篇Paper。今天我们就为大家具体介绍怎么写作Literature Review文献总述。

　　以下是EssayQuality小编给大家整理的一篇文献综述LiteratureReview精选范文选段参考~~

And it emphasized the importance of the maxim of Quality. He believes that the speaker who violates Quality of Maxim is lying and lying is a moral offence. However, there exists a lot of deception in language interactions and Cooperative Principle can not explain it forcefully. Then, Leech put forth the Politeness Principles (PP) with the intention to ‘rescue’ Grice’s Cooperative Principle (CP). He held that people use deception in consideration of politeness.

His PP is further categorized into six main maxims, which go in pairs as follows:

1) Tact Maxim;

(a)Minimize cost to other [(b)] Maximize benefit to other;

2) Generosity Maxim;

(a)Minimize benefit to self [(b)] Maximize cost to self;

3) Approbation Maxim (in expressive and assertive);

(a)Minimize dispraise of other [(b)] Maximize praise of other;

4) Modesty Maxim (in expressive and assertive);

a) Minimize praise of self [(b)] Maximize dispraise of self;

5) Agreement Maxim (in assertive); a) Minimize disagreement between self and other [(b)] Maximize agreement between self and other

6) Sympathy Maxim (in assertive).

The most adequate illustration of deception from the pragmatic angle stems from He Ziran and Zhang Shuling in domestic. They view this phenomenon from the angle of adaption theory. According to Jef Verschuren, using language must consist of the continuous making of linguistic choices, consciously or unconsciously. The choice of deception is to adapt to the mental, social or physical world of the speaker or the listener. Though the studies of deception of the two scholars from pragmatic perspective is comprehensive, they ignore deception in pragmatics is a strategy. And the use of deception is not just out of politeness, their interpretation is not systematic.

It is Qian Guanlian who first studies the topic of true and false speech. He classified the false information into two kinds: profitable false speech and functional false speech. The former consists of “false speech to injure others” and “false speech to benefit others”. In the article “False Information”, Professor Qian classifies the deceptive information into beneficial or harmful false information, and functional false information). The false information which is used to deceive the addressee deliberately is called beneficial or harmful false information. Falsity in the beneficial or harmful false information is not known to the addressee. Professor Qian further classifies it into two kinds: beneficial false information and harmful false information. The false information which is controlled under certain background and can be used to achieve some special effects is called functional false information. All in all, Qian’s False Information is helpful in improving the understanding of deception.

 Actually, the linguistic study of deception is still on the infant stage. Compared with the researches made by foreign scholars, the researches made by Chinese scholars are still not enough

本篇文章转载至优质官网：http://www.essayquality.com